What is art: modern meanings and challenges
Abstract
This article presents a search for an answer to the question “what is art?” in the changed conditions of our time. The author does not aim to develop a modernized definition of such a polysemantic concept as art, but at the same time the relevance of rethinking and clarifying individual definitions is obvious. There are many objects and projects at modern exhibitions that position themselves as works of art cause a lot of controversy among viewers and critics. Finding markers that make it possible to separate genuine works from “various types of art” (Yu.M. Lotman) is a difficult and urgent task. Initially, the author examines the stages of formation of the “art” concept and its functions, tested by time, briefly reveals the importance of the main functions (aesthetic, cognitive-heuristic, communicative, educational, etc.). Further, it is noted that such fundamental criteria as aesthetic qualities and skill, the professionalism of the performance of a work in the XX–XXI centuries in many artistic practices have lost their significance. Almost any activity aimed at creating projects that do not carry a functional load has received the right to be called art. However, art is a figurative assimilation of reality, therefore, using new materials and trying to saturate his creation with actual meanings, a modern artist will only remain in the field of art when his work has deep artistic imagery. In the traditional way of development of art, the sensual, aesthetic material for creating an artistic image dominates, in postmodern trends – contexts and associations. In the conclusion, the need for the responsibility of art to society and society to art is emphasized.
About the Author
M. V. MoskalyukRussian Federation
Marina V. Moskalyuk, D.Sc. (Art Criticism), Professor, Rector
Krasnoyarsk, 660049
References
1. 1/ Bagdasar`yan, N.G. (2019), Kul`turologiya: uchebnik i praktikum dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Cultural studies: textbook and workshop for academic undergraduate studies], Yurajt, Moscow, 614 р. (in Russ.)
2. 2/ Bauman, Z. (2018), Tekuchaya sovremennost` [Current modernity] / Per. from eng. Yu.V. Asochakova (ed.), Piter, St. Petersburg, 240 р. (in Russ.)
3. 3/ Baxtin, M.M. (1986), Art and responsibility, E`stetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity], 2 ed., Iskusstvo, Moscow, pp. 7–8. (in Russ.)
4. 4/Borev, Yu.B. (1991), E`stetika [aesthetics], Izdatel`stvo politicheskoj literatury, Moscow, 399 p. (in Russ.)
5. 5/ Danto, Artur (2018), Chto takoe iskusstvo? [What is art?], Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, 168 p. (in Russ.)
6. 6/Zhevak, A.I. (2015), Tendencii razvitiya sovremennogo izobrazitel`nogo iskusstva vtoroj poloviny` XX–XXI vekov: kul`turfilosofskij analiz [Trends in the development of contemporary fine art of the second half of the 20th-21st centuries: cultural philosophical analysis], Abstract of Cand. Sc. Thesis, Volgograd, 27 p. (in Russ.)
7. 7/Iskusstvo v sovremennom mire. Sbornik statej (2011) [Art in the Modern World. A collection of articles], vol. 4, Pamyatniki istoricheskoj my`sli, Moscow, 440 p. (in Russ.)
8. 8/Klyushina, E.V., Mal`ceva, S.V., Stanyukovich-Denisova, E.Yu. (2018), “Artifact. Art object. Argument. Object in the visual arts: gaining new meanings in the era of New and Modern times”, Aktual`ny`e problemy` teorii i istorii iskusstva [Topical problems of the theory and history of art], № 8, pp. 15–25, Available at: http://actual-art.spbu.ru/publikatsii/politika-izdaniya.html (in Russ.)
9. 9/ Krivczun, O. (2011), “Metaphysics of artistic contemplation”, Iskusstvo v sovremennom mire. Sbornik statej [Art in the Modern World. A collection of articles], vol. 4, Pamyatniki istoricheskoj my`sli, Moscow, 440 p. (in Russ.)
10. 10/Nikonova, S.B. (2009), Crisis of artistic forms in the context of globalization processes, Kul`tura na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov: globalizacionny`e process [Culture at the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: globalization processes], Nestor-Istoriya, St. Petersburg, pp. 472–479 (in Russ.)
11. 11/ Ortega-i-Gasset, X. (1991), Dehumanization of art, Ortega-i-Gasset X. E`stetika. Filosofiya kul`tury` [Aesthetics. Philosophy of culture], Moscow, pp. 220–223 (in Russ.)
12. 12/ Sarikek, G.R. (2018), “Art of the 21st century as part of a comfort society (philosophical and aesthetic analysis)”, Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskij region. Obshhestvenny`e nauki [University News. NorthCaucasian region. Social sciences series], no. 2, pp. 22–27. (in Russ.)
13. 13/ Sociologiya iskusstva. Xrestomatiya [Sociology of art. Anthology], V.S. Zhukov, T.A. Klyavina (ed.), ProgressTradiciya, Moscow, 2010, 496 p. (in Russ.)
14. 14/Tolstaya, T.N. (2000), Kvadrat, Available at: http://dictionnaire.narod.ru/square.htm (Accessed: 03 April 2021). (in Russ.)
15.
Review
For citations:
Moskalyuk M.V. What is art: modern meanings and challenges. ARTE. 2021;(2):5-11. (In Russ.)