Preview

ARTE

Advanced search

Antivitruvian Aesthetics in Contemporary Architecture Projects

Abstract

The image of modern architecture, morphogenesis methods, construction technologies, ways of self-expression, interaction with people, purpose, objectives, principles are very different from the architectural representations existed before. Antivitruvian aesthetics, mainly based on the rejection of generally accepted dogmas, generally accepted order, gained a rapid development at the end of XXth century. Despite the fact that a quite long time separates us from the antivitruvian aesthetics appearance moment, antivitruvian aesthetics development question remains to be insufficiently researched. This research paper considers the antivitruvian aesthetics emergence reasons, its influence mechanism on human consciousness, its application in architecture. Research objectives include the antivitruvian aesthetics development dynamic in the modern world, its development vector determination. Research method is the comparative analysis of traditional and modern architecture from the morphogenesis and concepts creation attitude. Research result has showed that the striving of an architects to the antivitruvian aesthetics is rather the recognition of a deep civilizational crisis than the intention of individual creators.

About the Author

I. V. Kirichkov
Dmitry Hvorostovsky Siberian State Academy of Arts; Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Kirichkov Igor Vladimirovich, Scientific researcher; architect, graduate student



References

1. Vlasov V. G. The Historicism of Architecture and the Vitruvian Triad as a Design Metaphor // Architecton: News of Universities. 2014. № 46: 5–19.

2. Boye A. A. The Problem of Expressing the Anti-aesthetics of Dadaism and its Classification // Artikul. 2016. № 23: 17–25.

3. Rosenkranz J. K. F. Ästhetik des Häßlichen. Königsberg, 1853.

4. Dzikevich S. A. Aesthetics: The Beginnings of the Classical Theory: A Textbook for High Schools. Moscow: Academic project; “Peace” Foundation, 2011: 40.

5. Jenks C. A New Paradigm in Architecture [Electronic resource]. Trans. from English. Lozhkin A., Sitar S. URL: http://www.a3d.ru/architecture/stat/155 (аccess: 15.04.2018).

6. Turbin V. A. Deconstructivism. Corpus. Architectural Almanac. Vol. 2. Web version. URL: https://cih.ru/k2/decon1.html (access: 25.03.2018).

7. Eisenman P. Visions Unfolding: Architecture in the Age of Electronic Media // Domus. 1992. № 734: 21–24.

8. Chumi B. The Pleasure of Architecture // Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. Bath: Academy Edition, 1997: 268–269.

9. Libeskind D. Unoriginal Signs // Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. Bath: Academy Edition, 1997: 281.

10. Kipnis J. Forms of Irrationality // Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. Bath: Academy Edition, 1997: 288.

11. Karpova E. V., Mischenko N. A., Pomorov S. B. The Influence of the Architectural Environment on the Psychological State of a Person // Bulletin of AltSTU of I. I. Polzunov. 2015. № 1–2: 212–215.

12. Korotich A. V. Actual Problems of Modern Conceptual Russia Architecture // Academic Bulletin Ural Research Institute of Russian Academy of Building Sciences. 2012. № 1: 49–53.

13. Korotkova S. G. Conceptuality and Design as the Basis for Expressing an Architectural Work: сollection of proceedings on the results of an international scientific and practical conference. № 2. Samara, 2015: 113–115.

14. Bystrova T. Specificity of Design Concepts in architecture and design [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.taby27.ru/tvorcheskie_raboty/50/koncepcij-v-arxitekture.html (аccess: 15.04.2018).

15. Hadid Z. The Eighty-Nine Degrees // Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. Bath: Academy Edition, 1997: 280.


Review

For citations:


Kirichkov I.V. Antivitruvian Aesthetics in Contemporary Architecture Projects. ARTE. 2020;(3):34-41. (In Russ.)

Views: 487


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-1106 (Online)