Deleuzian Paradigm Projection on the Condition of Modern Architecture

The history of society is a complex, contradictory process in which rapid rise and heavy fall, inspirational successes and deep disappointments are closely intertwined. And society was guided by a certain, not always right set of paradigms in each of the historical periods. The adoption of new paradigms was facilitated not so much by their potential world-describing power as by the satisfaction of fleeting demands of a part of society. Method of this research is a systematic analysis, the purpose of which is to consider Deleuzian paradigm in the context of modern architecture. The research result has showed that the Deleuzian paradigm success was caused by the deepest ideological crisis of Western European culture of the second half of the ХХth century, which led to the failure of most social institutions, the recognition of almost complete inability to solve even the simplest problems. The Deleuzian paradigm, if not completely, partially has significantly changed the way of architectural thinking along with the transformation of the form, filling the designed objects by the new functional content. Architectural thinking on the background of human impotence in front of Nature, immersion in a state of despair ceased to follow the usual trajectory – to appeal to perfection, beauty, absolute truth, ideals.

1. Carpo M. The Alphabet and the Algorithm. London, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2011: 9.

2. Pisarchik L. Yu. G. Deleuze on the Philosophy of G. V. Leibniz and the Baroque Style. Vestnik № 7 (113). 2010: 28-38.

3. Deleuze G. Pourparlers. 1972 – 1990. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 2004: 209.

4. Shalaginov D. Gilles Deleuze: History or Formation. Literary and Philosophical Journal Topos. URL: http://www.topos.ru/article/ontologicheskie-progulki/zhil-delez-istoriya-ili-stanovlenie Access: 07.07.2019.

5. Camus A. The Myth of Sisyphus. Essay on the Absurd. // Camus A. The Revolting Man. Philosophy. Policy. Art. Moscow: Politizdat, 1990: 6-22.

6. Sartre J-P. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. S-Pb.: Azbuka, 2007: 10-15.

7. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow: PROGRESS, 1977: 28-30.

8. Lakatos I. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Moscow: Medium, 1995: 10-12.

9. Planck M. Where is Science Going? New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 1932.

10. Jenks A. Ch. The Language of Postmodern Architecture. / Trans. from English. A. V. Ryabushin, M. V. Uvarova. Edited by A. V. Ryabushin, V. L. Hait. M.: Stroizdat, 1985: 14.

11. Venturi R. Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1966: 16.

12. Rappaport A. Historical Paradigmatics of Architecture. URL: https://archi.ru/russia/49901/istoricheskaya-paradigmatika-arkhitektury Access: 13.06.2019.

13. Derrida J. Of Grammatology. Trans. N. Avtonomova. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 2000: 134.

14. [Dobritsyna I. A. From Postmodernism to Nonlinear Architecture: Architecture in the Context of Modern Philosophy and Science. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2004: 181.