Preview

ARTE

Advanced search

Interrelation of the process of cognition and artistic creativity (on the example of paintings by Siberian artists)

Abstract

The presented work considers artistic creativity in the context of its understanding as an essential characteristic of a person and his being in general. The article attempts to find out how the creative attitude to reality is rooted in the very nature and essence of man. It is suggested that art is one of the forms of knowledge, and the process of artistic creativity is cognitive activity. On the example of the work of Siberian painters K. S. Voinov, M. S. Ombysh-Kuznetsov and G. P. Kichigin, the relationship between man and the world is revealed through the prism of art. It is proved that artistic creativity is their way of knowing reality. As a result of working with the source base and the works of Siberian masters submitted for analysis, it is concluded that art, along with science, sets guidelines for processes taking place at various levels of human existence. It is substantiated that at all stages of the development of science, art contributed to the introduction of the knowledge gained into real life, and science, in turn, used art as a means of figurative knowledge of the surrounding reality.

About the Authors

T. Yu. Serikova
Siberian Federal University; Dmitry Hvorostovsky Siberian State Academy of Arts
Russian Federation

Tatiana Yu. Serikova, Cand. Sc. (Art Criticism), Associate Professor at the Department of Design, Institute of Architecture and Design ; Associate Professor at the Department of Painting

660041, Krasnoyarsk

660049, Krasnoyarsk



I. A. Milovanov
Dmitry Hvorostovsky Siberian State Academy of Arts
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Milovanov, Lecturer at the Department of Painting

660049, Krasnoyarsk



N. A. Strizhneva
Dmitry Hvorostovsky Siberian State Academy of Arts
Russian Federation

Nadezhda A. Strizhneva, Member of the Union of Artists of Russia, Associate professor of the Department of Folk Art Culture

660049, Krasnoyarsk



References

1. Berdjaev, N.A. (2002), Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie social'nye i literaturnye (1900–1906 gg.) [Sub specie aeternitatis. Philosophical, social and literary experiments (1900–1906 гг.)], Kanon+, Reabilitacija, Moscow, 655 p. (In Russ.)

2. Berdjaev, N.A. (2024), Filosofija svobody. [Philosophy of freedom], Jurajt, Moscow, 201 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bulgakov, S.N. (2024), Filosofija hozjajstva [Philosophy of farming], Jurajt, Moscow, 282 p. (In Russ.)

4. Gosudarstvennyj oblastnoj hudozhestvennyj muzej «Liberov-centr» Vystavka «Zhizn' na kraju sveta». 18–30 oktjabrja 2018 goda. [State Regional Art Museum «Liberov Center» Exhibition «Life on the Edge of the World». October 18–30, 2018], Available at: https://omsk.bezformata.com/listnews/vistavka-zhizn-na-krayu-sveta/70212582/ (Accessed 15 May 2024) (In Russ.)

5. Demenev, D.N. (2023), “Art as a form of knowledge”, Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoj nauki tehniki i obrazovanija: Tezisy dokladov 81-j mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-tehnicheskoj konferencii (Magnitogorsk 17–21 aprelja 2023 goda). [Current problems of modern science, technology and education: Abstracts of the 81st international scientific and technical conference (Magnitogorsk 17 –April 21, 2023)], Tom 2, Magnitogorskij gosudarstvennyj tehnicheskij universitet im. G. I. Nosova. Magnitogorsk, р. 140. (In Russ.)

6. Demenev, D. N. Kovalkova, A.V., Krylov, D.N. (2023), “On the integrative nature of art in the context of traditions and innovations”, Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoj nauki tehniki i obrazovanija: Tezisy dokladov 81-j mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-tehnicheskoj konferencii (Magnitogorsk 17–21 aprelja 2023 goda). [Current problems of modern science, technology and education: Abstracts of the 81st international scientific and technical conference (Magnitogorsk 17 –April 21, 2023)], Tom 2, Magnitogorskij gosudarstvennyj tehnicheskij universitet im. G. I. Nosova. Magnitogorsk, р. 138. (In Russ.)

7. Zhukovskij, V.I. (2011), “Ideal-based system of culture: the principle of the structure of dialectical self-movement and self-development”, Filosofija i kul'tura [Philosophy and culture], no. 6. рр. 65–72. (In Russ.)

8. Kant, I. (2017), Antropologija s pragmaticheskoj tochki zrenija [Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view], URSS: Lenand, Moscow, 194 p. (In Russ.)

9. Kachaj, I.S. (2023), “Ontological epistemological and anthropological dimensions of creativity in the context of classical European philosophy”, Chelovek i kul'tura [Man and culture], no. 6. рр. 137–152. (In Russ.)

10. Konstantin Vojnov: hudozhnik-zhivopisec. [Konstantin Voynov: artist-painter], Available at: http://www.voinov-k.ru/o-hudozhnike.php (Accessed 15 May 2024) (In Russ.)

11. Lekus, E.Ju. (2022), “Beauty in art: synthesis of the beautiful and the ugly”, Mir nauki. Sociologija filologija kul'turologija. [World of Science. Sociology philology culturology], Vol. 13, no. 2, Available at: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/44KLSK222.pdf. DOI: 10.15862/44KLSK222. (Accessed 15 May 2024) (In Russ.)

12. Losskij, N.O. (1991), “The Case for Intuitionism”, Izbrannoe [Favourites], Pravda, Moscow, рр. 13–337. (In Russ.)

13. Manin, V.S. (2007), Russkaja zhivopis' XX veka [Russian painting of the 20th century], Iskusstvo, Moscow, 415 p. (In Russ.)

14. Moskaljuk, M.V., Serikova, T. Ju. (2012), Zhivopis' Sibiri vtoroj poloviny XX – nachala XXI veka v kontekste vizualizacii kul'tury [Russian painting of the 20th century], Sibirskij federal'nyj universitet, Krasnojarsk, 172 p. (In Russ.)

15. Panteleeva, I.A. (2018), “Visualization of the concept of «Siberian ethnos» in the works of Krasnoyarsk artist Konstantin Voynov”, Izvestija Bajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. [Bulletin of the Baikal State University], no. 2. рр. 325–333. (In Russ.)

16. Podol'naja, V.V. (2016), “Mythological images in the art of Omsk”, Student: nauka professija zhizn': Materialy III vserossijskoj studencheskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Omsk 25–29 aprelja 2016 goda) [Student: science profession life: Materials of the III All-Russian student scientific conference with international participation (Omsk April 25–29, 2016)], Omskij gosudarstvennyj universitet putej soobshhenija, рр. 150–153. (In Russ.)

17. Serikova, T.Ju., Nezgovorova, N.A., Strizhneva, N.A. (2021), “Continuity in contemporary fine art of Siberia (school of A. M. Znak. A. N. Liberov and G. P. Kichigin. N. D. Gritsyuk and M. S. Ombysh-Kuznetsov)”, Arhitekton: izvestija vuzov [Architect: news from universities], no. 4. рр. 11–37. (In Russ.)

18. Fedorov, N.F. (1982), Sochinenija [Works], Mysl', Moscow, 711 p. (In Russ.)

19. (1927) “Florensky Pavel Andreevich”, Jenciklopedicheskij slovar' Russkogo bibliograficheskogo instituta «Granat» [Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian Bibliographic Institute "Granat"], Moscow, рр. 143–144. (In Russ.)

20. Chirkov, V.F. (2023), “Georgy Kichigin: human problems and the portrait genre in contemporary art”, Iskusstvo Evrazii [Art of Eurasia], Vol. 30, no. 3. рр. 166–193. (In Russ.)

21. Jamnaja V. B. (2022), “Symbolic space in the works of M. S. Ombysh-Kuznetsova using the example of works from the series "Closed Pictures"”, Tvorchestvo i sovremennost [Creativity and modernity], Vol. 17, no. 2. рр. 43–49. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Serikova T.Yu., Milovanov I.A., Strizhneva N.A. Interrelation of the process of cognition and artistic creativity (on the example of paintings by Siberian artists). ARTE. 2024;(3):89-102. (In Russ.)

Views: 110


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-1106 (Online)